Perspectives on Expanded Scope of Practice in Cytotechnology.

INTRODUCTION: In an effort to identify professional trends while offering meaningful resources to support decision making in the cytopathology community, the ASC/ASCP Workgroup: Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology conducted several data collection activities to assess the current state and professional trends of cytotechnologist (CT) practice. This information is intended to inform evidence- based development of education and workforce model(s). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research was conducted through mixed-method data collection processes. These included the ASCP Board of Certification (BOC) Practice Analysis, focus groups used to gather qualitative data regarding the perceptions and experiences of current stakeholders in cytopathology through face-to-face discussion, and a RAND Delphi study conducted to gather qualitative data regarding the perspectives and "pulse" of decision makers influencing cytopathology practice. RESULTS: Research findings reveal that practice patterns with new and emerging technologies are changing the workplace for many cytotechnologists. Cytotechnologists are increasingly performing tasks within the laboratory that extend beyond their formal training and are looking to professional societies to bridge the gap. Although many laboratory leaders embrace the use of cytotechnologists in expanded roles, regulatory restrictions and reimbursement rules are among acknowledged barriers to change. CONCLUSIONS: This study examines current marketplace needs and cytotechnologists' perceptions of their evolving workplace demands through qualitative data collection. This study provides a snapshot of the cur- rent climate of cytopathology and data that will help direct future education, personnel training needs, and staffing decisions.

Voices from the Field: Supporting the Educational Needs of Cytotechnologists.

INTRODUCTION: Sustaining a well-trained, competitive, and marketable cytotechnology workforce is a major goal of the American Society of Cytopathology/American Society for Clinical Pathology Workgroup Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology (ASC/ASCP Workgroup). This article describes the data collection initiatives performed by the Workgroup to confirm cytotechnologist (CT) perceived educational needs to keep pace with emerging practice changes in the workplace. In response to data collected, the Workgroup created Advanced Cytopathology Education (ACE)da unique, innovative educational resource designed to fulfill this need. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection efforts included annual needs assessment surveys to gauge CT participants' preferred topics and learning modalities. These data were used to design and prioritize ACE topics. Program evaluations were also administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of program quality and effectiveness at meeting their educational needs. RESULTS: Research findings reveal CT education needs to align with emerging practice areas as reported in other Workgroup data collection efforts. The incorporation of new entry-level competencies in cytotechnology training programs prepares new CT graduates, but there is no standardized mechanism for formal, robust, and recognized ongoing education for other practicing CTs. CONCLUSIONS: This article highlights the educational endeavors carried out by the Workgroup in fulfilling the educational needs of practicing CTs as communicated through various data collection efforts. As CT responsibilities evolve, ASC and Workgroup efforts will continue to focus on providing educational support for current practicing CTs who need training in emerging practice areas.

Voices from the field: supporting the educational needs of cytotechnologists.

INTRODUCTION: Sustaining a well-trained, competitive, and marketable cytotechnology workforce is a major goal of the American Society of Cytopathology/American Society for Clinical Pathology Workgroup Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology (ASC/ASCP Workgroup). This article describes the data collection initiatives performed by the Workgroup to confirm cytotechnologist (CT) perceived educational needs to keep pace with emerging practice changes in the workplace. In response to data collected, the Workgroup created Advanced Cytopathology Education (ACE)-a unique, innovative educational resource designed to fulfill this need. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection efforts included annual needs assessment surveys to gauge CT participants' preferred topics and learning modalities. These data were used to design and prioritize ACE topics. Program evaluations were also administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of program quality and effectiveness at meeting their educational needs. RESULTS: Research findings reveal CT education needs to align with emerging practice areas as reported in other Workgroup data collection efforts. The incorporation of new entry-level competencies in cytotechnology training programs prepares new CT graduates, but there is no standardized mechanism for formal, robust, and recognized ongoing education for other practicing CTs. CONCLUSIONS: This article highlights the educational endeavors carried out by the Workgroup in fulfilling the educational needs of practicing CTs as communicated through various data collection efforts. As CT responsibilities evolve, ASC and Workgroup efforts will continue to focus on providing educational support for current practicing CTs who need training in emerging practice areas.

Perspectives on expanded scope of practice in cytotechnology.

INTRODUCTION: In an effort to identify professional trends while offering meaningful resources to support decision making in the cytopathology community, the ASC/ASCP Workgroup: Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology conducted several data collection activities to assess the current state and professional trends of cytotechnologist (CT) practice. This information is intended to inform evidence-based development of education and workforce model(s). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Research was conducted through mixed-method data collection processes. These included the ASCP Board of Certification (BOC) Practice Analysis, focus groups used to gather qualitative data regarding the perceptions and experiences of current stakeholders in cytopathology through face-to-face discussion, and a RAND Delphi study conducted to gather qualitative data regarding the perspectives and "pulse" of decision makers influencing cytopathology practice. RESULTS: Research findings reveal that practice patterns with new and emerging technologies are changing the workplace for many cytotechnologists. Cytotechnologists are increasingly performing tasks within the laboratory that extend beyond their formal training and are looking to professional societies to bridge the gap. Although many laboratory leaders embrace the use of cytotechnologists in expanded roles, regulatory restrictions and reimbursement rules are among acknowledged barriers to change. CONCLUSIONS: This study examines current marketplace needs and cytotechnologists' perceptions of their evolving workplace demands through qualitative data collection. This study provides a snapshot of the current climate of cytopathology and data that will help direct future education, personnel training needs, and staffing decisions.